The impact of debt default dimensions and buying opinions on financial status with the moderating role of business continuity

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 M.Sc. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Prof. of Accounting Department, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
3 Instructor of Accounting Department, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran -p.mamsalehi@pnu.ac.ir
4 .M.Sc.Accounting
10.22034/jmaak.2025.77675.4293
Abstract
The impact of debt default dimensions and buying opinions on financial status with the moderating role of business continuity

Abstract
The purpose of the research is to investigate the impact of debt default and buying comments on the financial status of companies with the moderating role of continuing the company's activity. Because these factors are the necessary background for adopting guidelines for the transparency of financial and non-financial information of companies and attracting domestic and foreign investors and economic prosperity of the country. The data needed for the research has been collected through the new Rahvard database and reports published in the comprehensive information system of publishers of the Stock Exchange Organization (Kodal website). The statistical population of the present study includes all the companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange that have the same conditions. For this purpose, the information of 127 companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange in the period of 2015 to 2015 was extracted based on the research variables through Rahvard Novin software and analyzed with the help of regression method with panel data approach in Eviews9 software. In order to measure the purchase of the auditor's opinion, the two-state model of Simamura and Hendarjatno (2019) was used. The results of the research show that the impact of debt default, purchase of opinion as variables affecting the financial status of companies as a dependent variable has a significant reverse. Also, the results of the test of the moderating role of continuity of activity showed that continuity of activity strengthens the effect of debt default, purchasing comments on the company's financial status.
Keywords

  • ابراهیمی فهادانی، الهه (1395). تأثیر حق‌الزحمه حسابرس و تاخیر در ارائه گزارش حسابرسی بر گزارش تداوم فعالیت حسابرس در شرکت‌های ورشکسته پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، حسابداری، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شهید چمران، اهواز، ایران.
  • امیری، اسماعیل.، و فخاری، حسین (1399). شاخص ترکیبی برای خرید اظهارنظر حسابرس مبتنی بر فن تحلیل ممیزی، بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 27(1)، 33-1.
  • بنی مهد، بهمن (1390). بررسی عوامل تاثیرگذار بر اظهارنظر مقبول حسابرس. فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار، 4(13) ، 83-59.
  • پیری، پرویز.، و سمانه برزگری صدقیانی.(1395). بررسی رابطه‌ی بین دوره‌ی تصدی و تغییر حسابرس با کیفیت سود شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران بر اساس مدل کاسنیک، پیشرفت­های حسابداری، 8(2)، 92-65.
  • رحیمیان، نظام الدین.،و توکل نیا، اسماعیل و میثم کرملو (1392). اظهارنظر حسابرسی تعدیل شده و ساختار سررسید بدهی. پژوهش های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 5(20)، 180-157.
  • صفی پور افشار.، و مجتبی، سلطانی نژاد، احمدصادق و ابراهیم سلطانی نژاد (1401). عوامل اثرگذار بر اظهارنظر حسابرس نسبت به تداوم فعالیت. پژوهش های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 14(56)، 136-115.
  • کمیته تدوین استانداردهای حسابرسی ایران (1383). استانداردهای حسابرسی، استاندارد شماره 570. تهران، انتشارات سازمان حسابرسی، 601-617.
  • یاری، حسن.، و شه بخش، محمود و رافیک باغومیان (1402). خرید اظهارنظر حسابرس و معاملات با اشخاص وابسته: شواهدی از بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهش های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 15(58)، 208-189.

 

  • Arnedo, L., Lizarraga, F., Sanchez, S., & Ruiz, E. (2012), Las Expectativas del Usuario Ante la Salvedad al Principio de Empresa en Funcionamiento. Evidencia Empírica delFenómeno de la Profecía Autocumplida Para el Caso Espanol ,Revista Española de Financiacinn y Contabilidad, 41(154), PP.263-289.
  • Agarwal, V. & Taffler, R.J (2007).Twenty-five Years of the Taffler Z-Score Model: Does it really have Predictive Ability?, Accounting and Business Research. 37 (4):PP 285–300.
  • Archambeault, D., & DeZoort,T. (2001),“Auditor Opinion Shopping and the Audit Committee: An Analysis of Suspicious Auditor Switches”,International Journal of Auditing, 5(1), PP. 33-52.
  • Brookman, J. & P. D. Thistle. (2009). CEO tenure, the risk of termination and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (3):PP 315-330.
  • Carson, E., Fargher, N., Geiger, M., Lennox, C., Raghunandan, K., & Willekens, M. (2012), Auditor Reporting on Going-concern Uncertainty: A Research Synthesis , Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), PP. 353- 284.
  • Chen, F., Peng, S., Xue, S., Yang, Z., and Ye, F., (2016), Do Audit Clients Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Partner-Level Evidence, Journal of accounting Research, Vol. 54, Issue 1, PP.79-112.
  • Choi, J. et al, (2018), Opinion Shopping to Avoid a Going Concern Audit Opinion and Subsequent Audit Quality, forthcoming in Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, PP. 1-47.
  • Davidson III, W. N., Jiraporn, P., and DaDalt, P. (2006), Causes and Consequences of Audit Shopping: an Analysis of Auditor Opinions, Earnings Management, and Auditor Changes, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 45(1-2), PP. 69-88.
  • Davis, R., Soo B, & Trompeter G.(2009). Auditor Tenure and the Ability to Meet or Beat Earnings Forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26 (2),PP 517–548.
  • Hapsoro, D., &Santoso, T. R. (2018), Does Audit Quality Mediate the Effect of Auditor Tenure, Abnormal Audit Fee and Auditor’s Reputation on Giving Going Concern Opinion?,International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(1), PP. 143-152.
  • Gallizo, J.L ., & Saladrigues R. (2015), An Analysis of Determinants of Going Concern Audit Opinion: Evidence from Spain Stock Exchange, Journal of Intangible Capital, 12(1), PP. 1-
  • Geiger M.A. and Raghunandan K, (2002). Auditor tenure andaudit reporting failures, Auditing: A journal of Practice & Theory. 21(1), PP. 67-78.
  • Johnson V.E., Khurana I.K. and Reynolds J.K, (2002). Audit firm tenure and the quality of Financial Reports. Contemporary Accounting Research,. 19(4), PP. 637-660.
  • Kirkos E., Spathis C., Nanopoulos A., Manolopoulos Y. (2008). Predicting qualified auditor’s opinions: A data mining approach. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, Vol 4(1), pp. 183-197.
  • Knechel, R., & Vanstrelen, A. (2007),“The Relationship between Auditor Tenure and Audit Quality Implied by Going Concern Opinions”,Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1),PP. 113-131.
  • Manry, D.; Turner, J.L. & Mock, T.J. (2008). Does Increased Audit Partner Tenure Reduce Audit Quality?. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23(4), PP.553-572.
  • Reichelt, K. and Wang, D. (2010), National and Office-Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality, Journal of Accounting Research . 48(3), PP. 647-686.
  • Seifzadeh, M., Salehi, M., Abedini, B., Khanmohammadi, M. H., & Ranjbar, M. H. (2021). Management Characteristics and Audit Opinion Shopping. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 5(4), 77-99.
  • Simamora, R. A., & Hendarjatno, H. (2019), The Effects of Audit Client Tenure, Audit Lag, Opinion Shopping, Liquidity Ratio, and Leverage to the Going Concern Audit Opinion ,Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), PP. 145-156.
  • Seifzadeh, M., Salehi, M., Abedini, B., Khanmohammadi, M. H., & Ranjbar, M. H. (2021). Management Characteristics and Audit Opinion Shopping. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 5(4), PP 77-99.
  • Srinidhi Bin , Leung Sidney and Gul Ferdinand. ,(2010). Auditor Tenure and Audit Quality: The Role of the Demand for Unique Client Specific Knowledge, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?
  • Vassalou, M., Xing, Y. (2004). Default Risk In Equity Returns. Journal of Finance, 59(2), PP 831-868.
  • Zureigat, Qasim Mohammad (2014). Factors Associated with Audit Reports in Saudi Arabia. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: The Accounting and Auditing. 14 (5) 5, PP 66-75.