Comprehensive Model of Oligarchy in Auditing: Investigating the Structure and Correcting Trends

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. student, Accounting, Tabriz branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Accounting Department, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
10.22034/jmaak.2026.23974
Abstract
Oligarchy in auditing has a critical view that audit affairs are in the hands of a distinct group and indicates that a special group in the auditing profession, with political governance and because of being close to government bodies, has the monopoly of auditing certain mother industries in companies and it has restricted the creation of competition by increasing the audit quality among audit institutions. T The statistical population of this research includes experienced professors in the field of auditing, partners of auditing institutions, and senior managers of auditing organizations, which was done during the years 2021 and 2021 and using the purposive mixed sampling method. Likewise, to measure the final model validity, the structural equation modeling approach was used and PLS software was used to fit it. The findings reveal that cultural, environmental, and social factors (0.345); structural and technical factors (0.439); political governance and managerial weakness (0.569), and inhibitory and supervisory factors (0.549) are effective in creating audit oligarchy. Likewise offering cultural and social platforms (0.328); structural and technical reforms (0.443); political and management reforms (0.514); strengthening the knowledge and skills of human resources (0.365) and legal and regulatory reforms (0.492) are among the strategies to limit oligarchy in auditing. Lastly, the cultural and social consequences on the audit profession (0.441) and creating a platform for increasing the audit quality (0.532) were explained as the consequences of limiting the oligarchy in the audit profession.
Keywords

بزرگ اصل، موسی. (1387). حسابرسی: حرفه‌ایی در خطر، ترجمه مقاله اتاق بازرگانی ایالات متحده در سال 2006، مجله حسابدار، شماره 201.
گافکین, میکائیل.، مهتدی، اعظم، اصغری, ایرج. (1394). مروری بر تئوری های انتقادی حسابداری، نشریه  حسابداری و منافع اجتماعی، 5(2)، صص78-59.   
صمیمی، سعید، بادآور نهندی، یونس، و متقی، علی اصغر.(1401). الگوی جامع عوامل موثر برشکاف بین انتظارات حسابرسان و استفاده‌کنندگان گزارش‌های مالی: رهیافت زمینه بنیان چندوجهی و معادلات ساختاری، نشریه حسابداری و اجتماعی ،12(1)، صص60-41.
صمیمی, سعید. (1402). خاستگاه حسابرس مسئول در پرتو تضاد شناختی مسئولیت‌های حسابرسان: کاربست زمینه‌بنیان در هم‏گرایی انتظارات، بررسی‏‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 3(30):505-481.
 
 
Arosalo, U., & Väyrynen, R. (1973). Financial and Industrial Oligarchy: Present Structure and Some Trends. Journal of Peace Research10(1-2),pp 1-35.‏
Bryant A (2002) Re-grounding Grounded Theory, The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol 4, No 1, pp 25-42.

Cole,A., Marasco, R ,. Tien,C.(2022). A Government of Creditors: Machiavelli on Genoa, the Bank of San Giorgio, and the Financial Oligarchy, VOL 54, (4).

Gorodnichenko,Y., Grygorenko,Y.)2022(. Are oligarchs productive? Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, Volume 36, Issue 1. https://doi. org/10.1016/ j.jce. 2008. 01.001.

‏Garcia,G.(2022). Colombian financial oligarchy (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).‏
Jones, Michael, Alony,Irit. (2011).Guiding the Use of Grounded Theory in Doctoral Studies An Example from the Australian Film Industry,International Journal of Doctoral Studies,VOL 6.
Kronenberger, Sebastian. Laux, Volker. (2019). Conservative Accounting, Audit Quality, and Litigation", ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? Abstract_ id=2818038.
Mansour,Nasser, Skinner, Nigel. (2008). Multi-Grounded Theory as a research methodology for theory development in education, Conference: ECER 2008.
Patnaik, P. (2019). The ideology of India’s corporate-financial oligarchy-A note. Studies in People’s History6(2), 193-201.
Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage; (2002).
Samimi, S., Badavar Nahandi, Y., & Mottaghi, A. A. (2022). The Convergence of the Expectations between Auditors and the Users of Financial Statements: A Multidimensional Grounded Theory and Structural Equation Modeling. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance6(3), 29-54. doi: 10.22067/ijaaf.2022.42039
Teddlie C, Yu F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling a typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol 1(1):PP 77-100.