Interpretive Structural Modeling to Improve Value Engineering Performance in Construction Projects in the Construction Sector of Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Author
department
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate and classify the relationships between the factors that influence the value engineering use in the Iranian construction industry. A researcher-made questionnaire was used for data collection. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were evaluated and verified by a team of Iranian construction industry experts. In this research, in addition to value engineering, project risk management requirements and the nature (nature) of the project were used in the conceptual model that improved the performance of value engineering workshops. Interpretive structural modeling method was used to classify the component relationships. Based on the interpretive structural model, the components of expert advice from value engineering team members, "savings rate", "return on investment", "value engineering team leader's satisfaction with the value engineering results" were at the highest level.The purpose of this research is to investigate and classify the relationships between the factors that influence the value engineering use in the Iranian construction industry. Value engineering is a systematic way of achieving project goals. This process is done by evaluating the objectives of the project and how to achieve them. Value engineering strives to improve design while reducing costs and time, increasing the value of the products in question, with the goal of maximizing efficiency and effectiveness in construction and construction projects. So all of these factors will result in us controlling our costs as much as possible.
Keywords

  • آذر، ع.، احمدی، پ. (1394). طراحی مدل استقرار مهندسی ارزش با رویکرد ISM مورد مطالعه: )شرکت صنعتی آرد ماشین). دومین همایش بین المللی مدیریت و فرهنگ توسعه.
  • آذر، ع.، خسروانی، ف.، جلالی، ر.، (1397)، تحقیق در عملیات نرم: رویکردهای ساختاردهی مسئله، تهران: سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
  • پوررضا، م.، ذوالنوریان، م.، عطری، س.، (1392)، آشنایی با مهندسی ارزش، تهران: مرجع دانش مهندسی ارزش ایران.
  • ساده، ا.، (1396)، مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری نقش تعهد به ارزشهای اسلامی در بهبود اخلاق کسب و کار و مسئولیت های اجتماعی شرکتی، پژوهش های اخلاقی، 89-116.
  • قلی پور، ی.، بیرقی، ح.، (1383)، مبانی مهندسی ارزش، ترمه.
  • کریمی، م. (1395)، بهبود بی تردید: آموزش کاربردی مهندسی ارزش، رسا.
  • کلانی، ا.، (1390)، آسیبشناسی موانع کاربرد مهندسی ارزش در پروژههای عمرانی در ایران و رتبه بندی موانع با استفاده از روش AHP، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
  • Bolanos, R., Nenclares, E., Pastor, P., (2005), Emerald Article: Using interpretive structural modelling in strategic decision-making groups. Management Decision, 877-895.
  • Chang, P., Chen, W., (2004), Evaluating the performance of VE study using factor analysis and AHP, Proceedings of SAVE International 44th Annual Conference, 12–15.
  • Chen, W., Chang, P., Huang, Y., (2010), Assessing the overall performance of value engineering workshops for construction projects, International Journal of Project Management, 514-527.
  • Dell Isola, A., (1997), Value Engineering: Practical Applications...for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Operations, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Huemann, M., Keegan, A., Turner, J., (2007), Human resource management in the project-oriented company: A review, International Journal of Project Management, 315-323.
  • Kazaz, A., Birgonul, M., Ulubeylia, S., (2005), Cost-based analysis of quality in developing countries: a case study of building projects, Building and Environment, 1356-1365.
  • Koga, M., (1996), probability, risk and value engineering in construction, international conference proceeding, save.
  • Kumar, D., Palaniappan, M., Kannan, D., Shankar, K., (2014), Analyzing the CSR issues behind the supplier selection process using ISM approach, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 268-278.
  • Lawshe, C., (1975), A quantitative approach to content validity, Personnel Psychology, 563–575.
  • Omigbodun, A., (2001), Value Engineering and Optimal Building Projects, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 40-43.
  • Palmer, A., Kelly, J., Male, S., (1996), Holistic Appraisal of Value Engineering in Construction in United States, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 324–328.
  • Panahifar, F., Byrne, P., Heavey, C., (2014), ISM analysis of CPFR implementation barriers, International Journal of Production Research, 5255-5272.
  • Turner, J., Müllerb, R., (2003), On the nature of the project as a temporary organization, International Journal of Project Management, 1-8.