بنیان‌های اخلاقی آموزش حسابداری و تمایل سهامداران مبتنی بر مدل کنفوسیوس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قزوین، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت، گیلان، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت، گیلان، ایران.

4 دانشیار، گروه مالی، دانشگاه پیام نور واحد رشت، گیلان، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به دنبال ارائه مدلی در راستای بنیان‌های اخلاقی آموزش حسابداری و تمایل سهامداران مبتنی بر مدل کنفوسیوس است. این پژوهش در زمره پژوهش‌های ترکیبی در دو مرحله کیفی و کمی اجرا گردید. جامعه آماری مرحله کمی تحقیق دانشجویان مقطع ارشد و دکتری رشته حسابداری، مدیریت مالی و اقتصاد دانشگاه‌های دولتی و آزاد استان تهران، مازندران و گیلان که سهامدار نیز می‌باشند، در نظر گرفته می‌شود، حداقل تعداد آن‌ها 300 نفر بود که با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی ساده و حجم نمونه مناسب از جدول مورگان حدود 169 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری در نظر گرفته شد اما در حدود 300 پرسشنامه توزیع گردید که در کل 250 پرسشنامه گردآوری شد. به طور کلی برای تجزیه و تحلیل مشاهدات از نرم افزار اسمارت پی ال اس استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد با بررسی مدل پژوهش می‌توان بیان کرد مهارت‌های اخلاقی بر چشم انداز ارزش سهامداران، بنیان‌های اخلاقی فردی بر چشم انداز ارزش سهامداران و بنیان‌های اخلاقی الزام آور بر چشم انداز ارزش سهامداران تاثیر ندارند؛ اما سایر روابط بین ابعاد برقرار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Ethical Foundations of Accounting Training and the Willingness of Shareholders Based on the Confuciumodel

نویسندگان [English]

  • fatemeh nasoury 1
  • Mohammad Reza Vatan parast 2
  • Keyhan Azadi 3
  • Mehdi Meshki Miavaghi 4
1 Ph.D. Student, Accounting Department, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran,
2 Assistant Prof, Department of Accounting, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3 Assistant prof. of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
4 Associate Prof, Department of Finance, Payame Noor University, Rasht Branch, Gilan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The present study seeks to provide a model for the ethical foundations of accounting training and the willingness of shareholders based on the Confucius model. This research was conducted as a combination of qualitative and quantitative research. The statistical population of the small stage of research of master's and doctoral students in accounting, financial management and economics of public and free universities in Tehran, Mazandaran and Gilan provinces, who are also shareholders, is considered to be at least 300 people. Simple random sampling and the appropriate sample size of Morgan's table of about 169 people were considered as statistical samples, but about 300 questionnaires were distributed and a total of 250 questionnaires were collected. In general, Smart-PLS software was used to analyze the observations. The results showed that by examining the research model, it can be stated that ethical skills do not affect the shareholder value perspective, individual moral foundations do not affect shareholder value perspective and binding ethical bases do not affect shareholder value perspective. But there are other relationships between the dimensions

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ethics
  • Moral Behavior
  • Moral Foundations
  • Confucius Principles
  • Stock Value Perspective

مراجع

  • براتی، معصومه؛ مرادی، مهدی؛ نوغانی دخت بهمنی، محسن. (1396)، رابطه بین رویکرد اخلاقی نسبی گرایی، رضایت شغلی و ماکیاولی گرایی بین جامعه حسابداران و حسابرسان، نشریه حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، شماره 4، صص 37-67.
  • حسینی، سیدعلی و بابائی، فاطمه. (1398)، ضرورت آموزش اخلاق و ارزش های اسلامی در برنامه درسی حسابداری دانشگاه­ها، فصلنامه پژوهش حسابداری و حسابرسی، دوره 9، شماره 1 (32). صص 21-40.
  • رحیمی کاکلکی، مینا؛ بنی طالبی دهکردی، بهاره؛ پیک فلک، جمشید. (1396)، عوامل مؤثر بررعایت اخلاق حرفه‌ای حسابداران. اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری، شماره ۱۲ (۱)، صص ۷۵-۸۷.
  • رحیمی، حمید و بهارلویی، فرشاد. (1397)، تاثیر جو اخلاقی بر اعتماد در کار تیمی با نقش میانجی رفتار اخلاقی، مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، دوره 7، شماره 2، شماره پیاپی 26، صص 129-158.
  • سرلک، نرگس. (1387)، اخلاق حسابداری، فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، سال سوم، شماره 1، صص 22-36.
  • کاظمی علوم، مهدی؛ عبدی، مصطفی؛ حیدری معقول، زهرا. (1397)، کارکرد اخلاقی تئوری عدالت در حسابداری، پژوهش حسابداری، دوره هفتم، شماره 4 (پیاپی 28)، صص 12-27.
  • کمیته فنی سازمان حسابرسی. (1385). آیین رفتار حرفه ای. چاپ ششم. انتشارات سازمان حسابرسی. صص 1-32.
  • نیکخواه فرخانی، زهرا؛ خوراکیان، علیرضا؛ جهانگیر، مصطفی؛ محمدی شهرودی، حامد. (۱۳۹۶)، تبیین مولفه­های رفتار اخلاقی کارکنان و مدیران شهری، فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری، شماره 12 (18)، صص1-15.
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Andersen M L., Klamm B K. 2018. Haidt’s social intuitionist model: What are the implications for accounting ethics education? Journal of Accounting Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.05.001.
  • Awamleh, R., & Gardner, W. L. 1999. Perceptions of leader charisma and
    effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 345-373.
  • Armstrong, M. A., Ketz, J. E., & Owsen, D. 2003. Ethics education in accounting: Moving toward ethical motivation and ethical behavior. Journal of Accounting Education, 21, 1–16.
  • Albrecht, W. S., & Sack, R. J. 2000. Accounting education: Charting the course through a perilous future. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
  • Blasi, A. 1983. Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178-210.
  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. 2006. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595-616.
  • Clikeman, P., and S. Henning. 2000. The socialization of undergraduate accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education (February): 1–17.
  • Christensen, A.L., Cote, J. & Latham, C.K. 2016. Insights Regarding the Applicability of the Defining Issues Test to Advance Ethics Research with Accounting Students: A Meta-analytic Review. J Bus Ethics 133, 141–163.
  • Chambers DW. 2011. Developing a self-scoring comprehensive instrument to measure Rest’s fourcomponent model of moral behavior: The moral skills inventory. Journal of Dental Education. 75(1): 23-35.
  • Chiu, R. K. 2002. Ethical judgement, locus of control, and whistle blowing intention: A case study of Mainland Chinese MBA students. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(9), 581–587.
  • Dien, D. S. F. 1982. A Chinese perspective on Kohlberg's theory of moral Developmental Review, 2(4), 331-341.
  • Dellaportas, S., B. Cooper, and P. Leung. 2006. Measuring moral judgment and the implications of cooperative education and rule-based learning. Accounting and Finance 46 (1): 53–70.
  • Friedman, M. 1970. A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. New York Times, 32–33, 122–126.
  • Goolsby, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. 1992. Cognitive moral development and
    Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 55–68.
  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. 2009. Liberals and conservatives
    rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and
    Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
  • Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.
  • Gaa, J. C. 1996. Ethics research and research ethics, introduction. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8(Supplement), 12–24
  • Haidt, J., & Graham, J. 2007. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.
  • Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. 1988. The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21.
  • Haidt, J., & Graham, J. 2007. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.
  • Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. 2011. Moral identity. In S.J. Schwartz et al. (Eds.)
  • Ip, P. K. 2009. Is Confucianism good for business ethics in China?.
    Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 463–476.
  • Ip, P. K. 2016. Leadership in the Chinese philosophical tradition: A critical
    In A. Habisch & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Cultural roots of
    sustainable management - Practical wisdom and corporate social responsibility (pp. 53–63). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Jones, J., D. Massey, and L. Thorne. 2003. Auditors’ ethical reasoning: Insights from past research and implications for the future. Journal of Accounting Literature 22: 45–103
  • Jennings, M. M. 2004. Incorporating ethics and professionalism into accounting education and research: A discussion of the voids and advocacy for training in seminal works in business ethics. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 7–26
  • Keller, A., K. Smith, and L. Smith. 2007. Do gender, education level, religiosity, and work experience affect the ethical decision-making of U.S. accountants? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 18 (3): 299–314.
  • Khosravi A, Yazdani R, Khami MR. 2014. Evaluation of ethical skills of junior and senior dental students in Tehran University of Medical Sciences [dissertation]. Tehran (Iran). Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
  • Kim, Y., & Kim, S. 2010. The influence of cultural values on perceptions
    of corporate social responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s dimensions to Korean public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 485–500
  • Lam, K.-C. J. 2003. Confucian business ethics and the economy. Journal
    of Business Ethics, 43(1/2), 153–161.
  • Lapsley, D. K., & Hill, P. L. 2008. On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 313–332
  • Levy, E. S., & Rakovski, C. C. 2006. A zero tolerance professor and student registration choices. Research in Higher Education 47(6), 735–754.
  • Mudrack, P. 2007. Individual personality factors that affect normative beliefs about the rightness of corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 46(1), 33–62.
  • May, S. 2006. Case studies in organizational communication: Ethical perspectives and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. 2009. Moral identity, moral functioning, and the development of moral character. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 237-274
  • O’Fallon, M., & Butterfield, K. 2005. A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 196–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.
  • Thomas, S. 2012. Ethics and accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 399–418.
  • Reinstein Alan, Natalie Tatiana Churyk, Eileen Z. Taylor and Paul F. Williams, 2019, Using Accounting Department Advisory Councils and Higher Quality Continuing Education Requirements to Improve the Accounting Profession’s Ethical Reasoning Skills, Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, ISBN: 978-1-78973-394-5.
  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. 1999a. Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. 1999b. DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644-659.
  • Rodriguez Gomez, S., Lopez Perez, M.V., Garde Sánchez, R. and Rodríguez Ariza, L. 2020, "Factors in the acquisition of ethical training", Education + Training, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  • Stark, J. S., M. A. Lowther, B. M. K. Hagerty, and C. Orczyk. 1986. A conceptual framework for the study of preservice professional programs in colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education 57: 231–258
  • Smith, W. J., Singal, M., & Lamb, W. B. 2007. Corporate social orientation in Japan and the USA: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 15, 181–209.
  • Sadler-Smith, E. 2012. Before virtue: Biology, brain, behavior, and the “moral sense”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22 (2), 351–376.
  • Sheehan, N. T., & Schmidt, J. A. 2015. Preparing accounting students for ethical decision making: Developing individual codes of conduct based on personal values. Journal of Accounting Education, 33, 183–197.
  • Stephenson, S. 2016. Reflective ethical decision: A model for ethics in accounting education. The Accounting Educators’ Journal 2016 Special Edition: 11–37.
  • Uysal, O. O. 2010. Business ethics research with an accounting focus: A bibliometric analysis from 1988 to 2007. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 137–160.
  • Verschoor, C. C. 2015. Whistleblower takes big risks. Strategic Finance, 97(2), 17-18.
  • Warth, R. J. 2000. Ethics in the accounting profession: A study. CPA Journal 70 (October): 69–70.
  • Wang X, Li F, Sun Q. 2018. Confucian ethics, moral foundations, and shareholder value perspectives: An exploratory study. Business Ethics: A Eur Rev. 260–271.
  • Woods, P. R., & Lamond, D. A. 2011. What would Confucius do? Confucian ethics and self-regulation in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 669–683.
  • Yu, J. Y. 2007. The ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirror of virtue.
    New York and London, Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Yao, X. 2000. An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zhu, Y. 2015. The role of Qing (positive emotions) and Li (rationality) in
    Chinese entrepreneurial decision making: A Confucian Ren-Yi wisdom perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 613–630
  • Zhao, L. L., & Roper, J. 2011. A Confucian approach to well-being and social capital development. The Journal of Management Development, 30(7/8), 740–752.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار