Presenting a sustainability model for asset value based on political and economic stability

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohammadhossein Emaratibakhshayesh 1
ali najafi mooghadam 2
Ali Baghani 2
Mohsen Hamidian 2
1 Ph.D Student of Accounting,Department of Accounting, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant professor of Department of Accounting, Tehran South, Islamic Azad University.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to provide a model of asset value stability based on political and economic stability; Research method in terms of purpose, basic-applied in terms of data type, mixed exploratory type. The statistical population of the qualitative part of the research included experts and senior managers of leading companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, economic managers and professors of economics. To determine the samples of this study and to determine this group of experts, purposive non-random sampling method was used for 30 people. The second group of the statistical population of this study included all companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange that using the systematic removal sampling method, 63 companies were selected as the sample of the study. To collect the data, semi-structured interview tools and modern software and scheduling software were used, as well as financial statements and information of the board of directors of the companies. The data analysis method in the qualitative part was fuzzy Delphi technique. In the inferential and quantitative sections, we used the data panel regression model to answer the research questions. The results showed that the indicators of stability of asset value are book value, market value, present value of assets and positive growth of assets. Finally, four models with different indicators of asset value stability for asset value stability based on political and economic stability were presented.
Keywords
Political stability
economic stability
asset value
asset pricing
  • اصغرپور، رضا، محسنی، محمد و فریدونی، محمدصادق، (1396)، اثر بی‌ثباتی سیاسی بر رشد اقتصادی ایران، مجله اقتصاد سیاسی، 4،7.
  • درویش، احسان، (1395)، " بررسی قیمت­گذاری صرف نقدشوندگی، اندازه، ارزش و ریسک بازار در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران"، فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار، شماره 17، صفحات 105-85.
  • زارعشاهی، علی (1397) بی‌ثباتی سیاسی و امنیت اقتصادی و تأثیر آن بر عوامل تولید در ایران، مجموعه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین الملل، مطالعات راهبردی، دوره 23، شماره 7.
  • زینالی،علی،(1395)، بررسی تأثیر ساختار سرمایه بر اندازه، نرخ بازده سرمایه و سود هر سهم شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران (مطالعه موردی: صنعت دارو)،سالسوم،شماره 9،صفحات 7 تا 61.
  • شیرازی، محمدعلی، (1398)، بررسی مخارج دولتی و منابع تأمین مالی آن بر تولید ناخالص داخلی و ثبات اقصادی در رشد اقتصادی در کوتاه مدت در ایران، اقتصاد مقداری، 4، 6.
  • فطرس، رامین، مهرانی، ساسان، رساییان، احمد، (1394). سی اثر تکانه پولی بر رشد اقتصادی و تورم با رهیافت تعادل عمومی تصادفی پویا، پژوهشها و سیاست‌های اقتصادی , 93-114.
  • کرم زاده، محمدحسین(1394). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر فروش سهام عادی شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس تهران. فصلنامه پیام مدیریت، (17) 4.
  • گوگردچیانی، ساسان و نائینی، باقر، (1397)، "نقش سیاست‌های پولی و اعتباری در مدیریت چرخه‌های تجاری کشور"، تحقیقات اقتصادی، شماره 2، صص51-64.
  • منفرد، احمد. (1396). بررسی ارتباط میان ریسک نقدشوندگی سهام و استراتژی‌های قیمت‌گذاری، ماه نامه دانش الکترونیک، خردادماه شماره 86 .
  • Ahmad, W., Sharma, S.K., (2018). Testing output gap and economic uncertainty as an explicator of stock market returns. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 45, 293–306.
  • Ake, Claude. (2004) ,Modernization and Political Instability, World Politics, V. 26, N. 4.
  • Asparouhova, E. , Bossaerts, P. , Roy, N. , Zame, W , (2016). Lucas in the laboratory. J. Finance 71 (6), 2727–2780 .
  • Bernak, B. and M. Gertler, (2014), Inside the Black Box: The CreditChannl of Monetary Policy Transmission, Journal of EconomicPerspectives, vol, PP 27-48.
  • Berry, J., Seppi, D.J., (2016) , “Common factors in prices, order flows and liquidity” , Journal of Financial Economics , Vol. 59, pp. 383–411.
  • Fenig, G, Mileva,M, Petersen, L, (2018), Deflating asset price bubbles with leverage constraints and monetary policy,  Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, PP:1-27.
  • Friendolang,Joseph. Hong, Harrison. C. Stein, Jeremy, (2015), Forecasting crashes: trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices, Journal of Financial Economics,No.61,pp.345-381.
  • Gholipour, H, (2019), The effects of economic policy and political uncertainties on economic activities, Research in International Business and Finance, Contents lists available at ScienceDirect.
  • Gordon M. (2015) political instability, policy uncertainty, and economic growth. Atlantic Economic Journal, Volume 29, Number 1, March.
  • Gulen, H., Ion, M., (2016). Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. Rev. Financ. Stud. 29, 523–564.
  • Jens, C.E, (2017). Political uncertainty and investment: Causal evidence from U.S. gubernatorial elections. J. Financ. Econ. 124, 563–579
  • Kia, Fabrizio. (2019) ,Political Instability, Uncertainty and Economics, Journal of Economic Surveys, V. 17.
  • King, Mervyn, (2018), Challenges for Monetary Policy and Bubble Prices, Bank of England, Quarterly Bulletin, November, pp397-415.
  • Lakewood, H, Habib,R, and Boca,K. (2018), International DevelopmentGovernance. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Zhang, M, Zhou, G, Gang,F, (2019), Political control and economic inequality: Evidence from Chinese Cities, China Economic Review, https://doi.org/1016/j.chieco.2019.01.011