The effects of accounting earnings differences with taxable incomes on audit quality with Emphasis on the Role of earnings quality

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Darioush Akhtarshenas 1
Isaac Behshour 2
Fereshteh Ahmadi Pak 3
1 Assistant Professor of Accounting, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Ph.D Student in Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Masters student in Auditing, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Accounting and taxation are two separate fields with different objectives, but they have one thing in common. In fact, accounting earnings are always the starting point to calculate income taxes. Taxable incomes are determined based on regular accounting procedures and tax-related laws. Moreover, one of the cases related to increased audit risks, which results in the alterations of quality, is high differences between book accounting earnings and taxable incomes. On this basis, the aim of present research to investigate the effects of earnings quality on the relationship of the difference between accounting earnings and taxable incomes with audit quality. In this regard, the statistical sample of the study includes data of 91 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during 2014-2017. Multivariate linear regression was used to test hypotheses. Findings indicated that earnings quality has a moderating role in the relationship of the difference between accounting earnings and taxable incomes with audit quality, so that corporations with high differences between accounting earnings and taxable incomes enjoy higher audit quality. That is, book-taxable income differences represent an observable measure of earnings quality, which has some effects of decisions made by auditors.
Keywords
Difference between accounting earnings and taxable incomes
Earnings quality
Audit quality
  • اسلامی ذرعی، محمد جعفر، پورعلی، محمدرضا. (1397). تأثیر محافظه‌‌کاری و اجتناب مالیاتی بر ابعاد کیفیت سود در شرکت‌‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین در مدیریت و حسابداری، 2(6)، 202-220.
  • آقایی، محمدعلی، حسنی، حسن، باقری، حسن. (1397). نقش توانایی مدیریتی در اجتناب مالیاتی شرکت: شواهدی از بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 15(57)، 47-24.
  • جهرومی، مهتاب. (1391). شفافیت شرکت‌‌ها و اجتناب از مالیات. پایان­نامه دوره کارشناسی ارشد حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران.
  • خواجوی، شکراله، کیامهر، محمد. (1394). بررسی رابطه­ی بین کیفیت حسابرسی و اجتناب مالیاتی در شرکت‌‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهشنامه مالیات، 23(26)، 108-87.
  • شجاع لله‌‌کائی، طاهره، نیک‌‌کار، بهزاد. (1397). آزمون ارتباط استقلال هیأت مدیره، اندازه هیأت مدیره و کیفیت حسابرسی با اجتناب مالیاتی. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 7(28)، 13-1.
  • علی‌‌پور، صفدر، امیری، اسماعیل، همتی، حسن. (1396). تأثیر شاخص‌‌های کیفیت حسابرسی بر ارتباط بین دستکاری سود و سرمایه‌‌گذاری بیش از حد. دانش حسابرسی، 17(68)، 191-169.
  • مشایخی، بیتا، علی‌‌پناه، صبری. (1394). تأثیر راهبری شرکتی بر رابطه­ی بین اجتناب از مالیات و ارزش شرکت. پژوهش‌‌های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 7(25)، 64-49.
  • مهرانی، ساسان، سیدی، سیدجلال. (1393). بررسی تأثیر مالیات بر درآمد و حسابداری محافظه‌‌کارانه بر اجتناب مالیاتی شرکت‌‌ها. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 3(10)، 33-13.
  • نوری‌‌صفت، مینا، اللهیاری، عباس. (1397). تأثیر کاهش سود تقسیمی بر اجتناب از پرداخت مالیات شرکت­ها. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 7(28)، 224-215.
  • Blaylock, B., Shevlin, T., and Ryan, J. W. (2012). Tax Avoidance, Large Positive Temporary Book-Tax Differences, and Earnings Persistence. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 91-120.
  • Chen, H., Chen, J. Z., Lobo, G. J., and Wang, Y. (2011). Effects of Audit Quality on Earnings Management and Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(3), 892-925.
  • Chen, H., Yang, D., Zhang, X., and Zhou, N. (2020). The Moderating Role of Internal Control in Tax Avoidance: Evidence from a COSO-Based Internal Control Index in China. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 42(1), 23-55.
  • Cornell, B., and Landsman, W. (2003). Accounting Valuation: Is Earnings Quality an Issue? Financial Analysts Journal, 59, 20-29.
  • DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 99-183.
  • Dechow, P., Ge, W., and Schrand, C. (2009). Understanding Earnings Quality: A Review of the Proxies, Their Determinants and Their Consequences. Working Paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Dechow, P., Sloan, R., and Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.
  • Defond, M. L. (1992). The association between changes in client firm, agency costs and auditor switching. Auditing, 11(1).
  • European Commission. (2019). Estimating International Tax Evasion by Individuals. Taxation Paper, 76.
  • Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., and Schipper, K. (2004). Cost of Equity and Earnings Attributes. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 967-1010.
  • Hanlon, M., Heitzman, Sh. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 127-178.
  • Hanlon, M., Krishnan, G. V., and Mills, L. F. (2012). Audit fees and book-tax differences. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 34(1), 55-86.
  • Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
  • Jonas, G., and Blanchet, J. (2000). Assessing Quality of Financial Reporting. Accounting Horizons, 14(3), 353-363.
  • Lev, B., and Nissim, D. (2004). Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1039-1074.
  • Meyer, M. J., and Rigs, J. T. (2007). The impact of auditor-client relationships on the reversal of first time audit qualifications. Managerial Auditing Journal, 53-65.
  • Mills, L. F., and Newberry, K. J. (2001). The influence of tax and non tax costs on book-tax reporting differences: Public and private firms. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 23(1), 1-19.
  • Piot, C. (2005). Auditor reputation and model of governance: A comparison of France, Germany and Canada. International Journal of Auditing, 9(1), 21-44.
  • Rego, S., and Wilson, R. (2012). Executive Compensation, Equity Risk Incentives, and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775–809.
  • Revsine, L., Collins, D. W., Johnson, W. B., and Mittelstaedt, H. F. (2005). Financial reporting and analysis. New York, NY: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Riguen, R. K., and Jarboui, A. (2017). Direct and mediated associations among earnings quality, book-tax differences and the audit quality. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 15(3), 293-316.
  • Schipper, K. and Vincent, L. (2003). Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons, 17, 97-110.
  • Sikka, P. (2008). Globalization and its discontents: Accounting firms buy limited liability partnership legislation in Jersey. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3), 398–426.
  • Tang, T., and Firth, M. (2012). Earnings persistence and stock market reactions to the different information in book-tax difference: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Accounting, 47(3), 369-397.
  • Watts, R. (2003). Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 207-222.
  • Watts, R., Zimmerman, J. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs.
  • Weber, D. P. (2009). Do Analysts and Investors Fully Appreciate the Implications of Book‐Tax Differences for Future Earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(4), 1175-1206.