* A professional judgment framework for financial reporting An international guide for preparers, auditors, regulators and standard setters. 2012 ,ICAS
*
Abdolmohammadi and Wright, 1987. J. Abdolmohammadi, D. Wright An examination of the effects of experience and task complexity on audit judgment Accounting Review, 62 (1) (1987), pp. 1-13
* Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2006. Earnings management, litigation risk, and asymmetric audit fee responses. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1)
* Abdolmohammadi, M., and A. Wright. 1987. An examination of the effects of experience and task complexity on audit judgments. The Accounting Review 62 (1)
* Altman, E. I., 1968, The prediction of corporate bankruptcy: a discriminant analysis, The Journal of Finance 23, 193–194.
* Anderson R., S. Mansi, and D. Reeb. 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (3)
* Anderson, n.1970, functional measurement and psychophysical judgment, psychological review vol. 77, no. 3
* Bagley, P. L. 2010. Negative affect: A consequence of multiple accountabilities in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (2)
* Anderson, M. J., 1988, A comparative analysis of information search and evaluation behavior of professional and non-professional financial analysts, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13, 431–446.
* Bedard, J. C., and L. E. Graham. 2002. The effects of decision aid orientation on risk factor identification and audit test planning. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21 (2)
* Benson, P. J. 1984. Writing visually: Design considerations in technical publications. Technical Communications 32 (4)
* Bonner S. E., R. Libby, and M. W. Nelson. 1996. Using decision aids to improve auditors’ conditional probability judgments. The Accounting Review 71 (2)
* Bonner, S. E, and B. L. Lewis. 1990. Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (3)
* Bonner, S. E. 1999. Commentary—judgment and decision making research in accounting. Accounting Horizons 13 (4)
* Bonner, S. E. 2008. Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting. Upper Saddle River,NJ: Prentice Hall
* Bonner.S 2008. Judgment and decision making in accounting.
* Brown, C. E., and I. Solomon, 1991, Configural information processing in auditing: the role of domain-specific knowledge, The Accounting Review 66, 100–119.
* Butler, S. A., 1985, Application of a decision aid in the judgmental evaluation of substantive test of details samples, Journal of Accounting Research 23, 513–526.
* Butt, J. L., and T. I. Campbell, 1989, The effects of information order and hypothesistesting strategies on auditors’ judgments, Accounting, Organizations and Society 14, 471–479.
* Casterella, J. R., K. L. Jensen, and W. R. Knechel. 2010. Litigation risk and audit firm characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (2)
* Clor-Proell, S. M. 2009. The effects of expected and actual accounting choices on judgment and decisions. The Accounting Review 84 (5)
* DeZoort, F. T., and S. E. Salterio. 2001. The effects of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments. Auditing, A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (2)
* DeZoort, T., P. Harrison, and M. Taylor. 2006. Accountability and auditors’ materiality judgments: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (4-5)
* Frederick, D. M., Heiman-HoVman, V. B., & Libby, R. 1994. The structure of auditors’ knowledge of Wnancial statement errors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13, 1–21.
* Frederickson, J. R., S. A. Peffer, and J. Pratt, 1999, Performance evaluation judgments: effects of prior experience under different performance evaluation schemes and feedback frequencies, Journal of Accounting Research 37, 151–165.
* Jane L. Butt. 1988. Frequency Judgments in an Auditing-Related Task. Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 26, No. 2 (1988)
* Haron, H. 2014. Factors influencing ethical judgement of auditors in Malaysia. Malaysian Accounting Review, 13 (2).
* Hoffman, V. B., J. R. Joe, and D. V. Moser. 2003. The effect of constrained processing on auditors’ judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (7-8)
* Hooper, C., and K. T. Trotman. 1996. Configural information processing in auditing: Further evidence. Accounting and Business Research 26 (2): 125–36.
* Guidance on Professional Judgment for CPAs(Released by The Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants on March 26, 2015)
* Kadous K., L. Koonce, and K. Towry. 2005. Quantification and persuasion in managerial judgement. Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (3)
* Kadous, K., A. M. Magro, and B. C. Spilker. 2008. Do effects of client preference on accounting professionals’ information search and subsequent judgments persist with high practice risk? The Accounting Review 83 (1).
* Kaplan, S. E., and P. M. J. Reckers, 1985, An examination of auditor performance evaluation, The Accounting Review 60, 477–487.
* Kelly, K. O., 2007, Feedback and incentives on nonfinancial value drivers: effects on managerial decision making, Contemporary Accounting Research 24, 523–556.
*
Kummer,T.
Schmit,M. 2016. The Influence of National Culture on Judgment and Decision Making in the Application of IFRS – Evidence from Fair Value Measurements Griffith University, ESCP Europe, Berlin
* Lehmann, C. M., and C. S. Norman. 2006. The effects of experience on complex problem representation and judgment in auditing: An experimental investigation. Behavioral Research in Accounting 18 (1)
* Libby, R., and J. Luft, 1993, Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment, Accounting, Organizations and Society 18, 425–450.
* McDaniel, L. S., 1990, The effects of time pressure and audit program structure on audit performance, Journal of Accounting Research 28, 267–285.
* Maines, L. A., and L. S. McDaniel, 2000, Effects of comprehensive income characteristics on nonprofessional investors’ judgments: the role of financial-statement presentation format, The Accounting Review 75, 179.
* Messier, W. F., Jr., 1995, Research in and development of audit decision aids: a review, in: R. H. Ashton, A. H. Ashton, eds., Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting and Auditing (Cambridge University Press, New York), 205–228.
* Moreno, K. K., S. Bhattacharjee, and D. M. Brandon, 2007, The effectiveness of alternative training techniques on analytical procedures performance, Contemporary Accounting Research 24, 983–1014.
* Nelson.m. , Hun Tong Tan. 2005. Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective. A Journal of Practice & Theory.
* Pillar, B. 2005. Audit quality in the 21st century. Presentation at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
*
Plous. S. 1993. The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill Education
* Rajni.M.2014. Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective, Accounting Perspectives 14(1)
* Sarah E. Bonner and Paul L. Walker. 1994. The Effects of Instruction and Experience on the Acquisition of Auditing Knowledge. The Accounting Review Vol. 69, No. 1 (Jan., 1994)
* The Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants , 2015. Guidance on Professional Judgment for CPAs
* Trotman, K. T., and P. W. Yetton, 1985, The effect of the review process on auditor judgments, Journal of Accounting Research 23, 256–267.
* Trotman, K. T. 2006. Professional Judgment: Are Auditors being Held to a Higher Standard Than Other Professionals? Sydney: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
* Trotman, K. T., H. C. Tan, and N. Ang. 2011. Fifty-year overview of judgment and decision making research in accounting. Accounting and Finance 51 (1)
* Waller, W. S., and W. L. Felix Jr. 1984. The auditor and learning from experience: Some conjectures. Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 (3)
Wright, A. 1988. The impact of prior working papers on auditor evidential planning judgments.
)