* بنی‌مهد، بهمن.، نجاتی، امیر. (1395). بررسی رابطه بین فرهنگ‌سازمانی و تعهد‌کاری حسابرسان، پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، ۸(۳۰): 137-119.
* تحریری، آرش.، پیری‌سقرلو، مهدی. (1395). درک حسابرسان از مفهوم تردید، در کار حسابرسی، بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، دوره 23، شماره 1، 135-117.
* حاجیها، زهره.، خدامرادی، الهه. (1394). نقش فرهنگ اخلاقی در عملکرد حسابرسان، فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری، ۱۱(۳): 125-130
* حساس‌یگانه، یحیی.، مقصودی، امید. (۱۳۹۰). ارزش‌های اخلاقی در قضاوت حرفه‌ای حسابرس، اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری، ۶ (۱): ۶۳-۷۴.
* رجبعلی‌زاده، جواد.، حصارزاده، رضا.، باقرپور، محمدعلی. (1395). بررسی رابطۀ بین دو بُعد شکاکیت و بی‌طرفیِ تردید حرفه‌ای با قضاوت حرفه‌ای حسابرس، فصلنامه علمی‌پژوهشی بررسی‌های حسابداری وحسابرسی، 23(2): 173-192.
* رنجبر، هادی.، حق دوست، علی اکبر.، صلصالی، مهوش.، خوشدل، علیرضا.، سلیمانی، محمدعلی.، بهرامی، نسیم. (1391). نمونه گیری در پژوهش های کیفی: راهنمایی برای شروع، مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارتش جمهوری اسلامی‌ایران، پاییز، دوره 10، 3(39): 238-250.
* رویایی، رمضان‌علی.، طالب‌نیا، قدرت الله، حساس‌یگانه، یحیی و صابر جلیلی. (13۹۵). ادراک حسابرسان از رهبری مورد اعتماد و فرهنگ اخلاق‌محور بر رفتارهای کاهنده کیفیت حسابرسی فصلنامه علوم مدیریت ایران، ۷(۲۵): 1-22.
* عباس‌زاده، محمدرضا.، صالحی، مهدی.، حسینی‌پور، رضا. (1396). فراتحلیل عوامل موثر بر اظهارنظر حسابرسی تعدیل‌شده، پژوهش‌های کاربردی در گزارشگری مالی، 6(1): 89-126.
* غلامرضایی، محسن.، حسنی، محمد. (1396). نقش طرز تفکر، ارزش‌های اخلاقی و انحراف‌های رفتاری در میزان تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان، پژوهش‌های کاربردی در گزارشگری مالی، 6(2): 47-84.
* منتی، وحید.، زمان، الهه. (۱۳۹۶). استقلال و بی‌طرفی حسابرسان داخلی، دوماهنامه حسابرسان داخلی،۳ (۱): ۶۵-۸۷.
* ولیان، حسن.، عبدلی، محمدرضا.، کریمی، شبنم. (1396). طراحی مدل تحلیل تفسیری-ساختاری ( ) عوامل موثر بر تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان. فصلنامه حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری. ۱۳۹۶؛ ۲ (۴): ۲۱۵-۲۴۶.
* Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Pike, R. (2014). Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors. The British Accounting Review,45(1), 10–23.
* Asbahr, K., Klaus, A. (2017). Real Effects of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Auditors' Judgment of Accounting Estimates (March 3). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3069755 or
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3069755
* Barrainkua, I., Espinosa-Pike, M. (2018). The influence of auditors’ professionalism on ethical judgement, Revista de Contabilidad–Spanish Accounting Review, 21 (2): 176–187.
* Barros, J., Sandelowski, M. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research, Springer publishing company Inc
* Bauer, T. (2015). The effects of client identity strength and professional identity salience on auditor judgments. The Accounting Review, 90(1): 95–114.
* Beck, C (2002), “Mothering multiples: a Meta synthesis of Qualitative research”, MCN, the American journal of maternal/child Nursing, 28(2): 93-99.
* Bell, T.B., Peecher, M.E. & Solomon, I. (2005). The 21st century public company audit: conceptual elements of KPMG’s global audit methodology. New York: KPMG LLP
* Berglund, N. R., Eshleman, J. D. (2017). Client and Audit Partner Ethnicity, Auditor Selection and Retention, and Audit Quality. Working Paper.
* Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Radtke, R. R. (2015). The influence of roles andorganizational fit on accounting professionals’ perceptions of their firms’ ethicalenvironment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(1), 125–141.
* Chen, J. A., & Tutwiler, M. S. (2017). Implicit theories of ability and self-efficacy. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225: 127–136
* Cushing, B. E. (2000). Economic analysis of skepticism in an audit setting. In 14th Symposium on Auditing Research, eds. Solomon, I. And Peecher, 1-3. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Office of Accounting Research.
* Dillard, J., Yuthas, K. (2002). Ethical Audit Decisions: A Structuration Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 36(1/2): 49-64.
* Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121.
* Ernstberger, J., Koch, C., Tan, H.T. (2013). Lead auditor’s technical and managerial knowledge, audit quality, and audit fees. Working paper.
* Espinosa-Pike, M., Barrainkua, I. (2016). An exploratory study of the pressures andethical dilemmas in the audit conflict. Spanish Accounting Review, 19(7): 10–20.
* Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Practitioner summary: Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), 1–10.
* Guiral, A., Rodgers, W., Ruiz, E., and Gonzalo-Angulo, J. A.,Can Expertise Mitigate Auditors’ Unintentional Biases?*, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.11.002
* Holtbrügge, D., Baron, A., & Friedmann, C. B. (2017). Personal Attributes, Organizational Conditions, and Ethical Attitudes: A social cognitive approach. BusinessEthics: A European Review, 24(3), 264–281
* Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29 (1): 149–171.
* Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45–97
* International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2006). The auditors' responsibilities related to fraud in the audit of financial statements. ISA 240. New York, NY: IFAC.
* International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2016). Handbook of international quality control, auditing, review, other assurance, and related services pronouncements. New York, NY: The International Federation of Accountants.
* International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2012a). Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. ISA 200. New York, NY: IFAC.
* International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators (IFIAR) (2015). 2014 inspection findings survey, The Netherlands. International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators (IFIAR) (2016). 2015 inspection findings survey, The Netherlands.
* Kaplan, H, B. (2005). Deviant identity, negative self-feelings, and decreases in deviant behavior: The moderating influence of conventional social bonding, Journal of Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 289-303
* Martínez-Salgado C. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: basic principles and some controversies. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva; 17 (3): 613-9.
* Martinov-Bennie, N., Pflugrath, G. (2009). The Strength of an Accounting Firm’s Ethical Environment and the Quality of Auditors’ Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 87: 237–253.
* McMillan, J. J. & White, R. A. (1993). Auditors’ belief revisions and evidence search: The effect of hypothesis frame, confirmation and professional skepticism. The Accounting Review, 68 (3): 443-465.
* Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34
* Noblit, G. (1988). Eta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies .CA: Newbury Park.
* Northcutt, N. McCoy, D. (2004). Interactive Qualitative Analysis: A Systems Method for Qualitative Research, US: Sage.
* Pflugrath, G., Martinov-Bennie N, Chen L. (2007). The impact of codes of ethics and experience on auditor judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal 22(6): 566- 589.
* Ranzilla, S., Chevalier, R. E., Herrmann, G., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2011). Elevating professional judgment. In S. Ranzilla, R. E. Chevalier, G. Herrmann, S. M. Glover, & D. F. Prawitt (Eds.). Auditing: The KPMG professional judgment framework. New York, NY: KPMG LLP
* Nolder, Ch, J., Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward, Accounting, Organizations and Society 67; 1–14.
* Nolder, C. J., Palmrose, Z. V. (2018). Economic analysis of proposed PCAOB Standards: Finding a path forward. Accounting Horizons (in press).
* Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34
* Shaub, M. K., & Braun, R. L. (2014). Call of duty: A framework for auditors’ ethi-cal decisions. In S Mintz (Ed.), Accounting for the public interest: perspectives onaccountability, professionalism and role in society (pp. 3–25).
* Shaub, M.K. (1996). Trust and suspicion: The effects of situational and dispositional factors on auditors’ trust of clients. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8: 154-174.
* Svanberg, J., Ohhman, P., Neidermeyer, P, E. (2018). Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs, Advances in Accounting, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.10.001
* Svanberg, J., Ohman, P. (2013). Auditors’ time pressure: Does ethical culture support audit quality? Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(7), 572–591
* Svanberg, J., Ohman, P. (2016). Does Ethical Culture in Audit Firms Support Auditor Objectivity? Accounting in Europe, 13(1): 65-79.
* Sweeney, B., Arnold, D., & Pierce, B. (2010). The impact of perceived ethical culture of the firm and demographic variables on auditors’ ethical evaluation and intention to act decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 531–551.
* Wastell, D. G. (2001). Barriers to effective knowledge management: Action research meets grounded theory. Journal of Systems&Information Technology, 5(2), 21–35
* Westermann, K., Cohen, J., Trompeter, G. (2014). The Influence of Accountability on Professional Skepticism, 10.2139/ssrn.2528648.
* Windsor, C., Ashkanasy, N. (1996). Auditor independence decision-making: The role of organizational culture perceptions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8(supplement), 80–97.
* Zhou, Y. D. (2017). Counteracting the directional influence of incentives on auditor judgment. Working paperEmory University.
)