ارائه مدل کیفیت افشای اطلاعات حسابداری مبتنی برتحلیل رفتار مالی مدیران (دیدگاه روانشناسی شناختی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه حسابداری، واحد گرگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،گرگان، ایران

2 دانشیار و عضو هیات علمی گروه حسابداری، واحد گرگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،گرگان، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

3 دانشیار و عضو هیات علمی گروه حسابداری، واحد علی آبادکتول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، علی آبادکتول، ایران

4 استادیار و عضو هیات علمی گروه مدیریت، واحد گرگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

در این پژوهش، رابطه بین رفتار مالی مدیران مبتنی بر روانشناسی شناختی و کیفیت افشای اطلاعات حسابداری با رویکرد معادلات ساختاری و معادلات رگرسیون مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. بدین منظور، نمونه ای متشکل از 128شرکت پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی سالهای 1386تا 1395 انتخاب گردید. رفتار مالی مدیران مبتنی بر روانشناسی شناختی (در مدل معادلات ساختاری متغیر پنهان، در مدل رگرسیون متغیر مستقل) توسط متغیر های مشاهده پذیر کوته بینی، رفتار فرصت طلبانه و اعتماد بنفس بیش از حد مدیران و کیفیت افشای اطلاعات حسابداری نیز با استفاده از امتیاز تعلق گرفته به هر شرکت توسط سازمان بورس اوراق بهادار تهران و از طریق اطلاعیه رتیه بندی شرکت ها از نظر کیفیت افشا و اطلاع رسانی مناسب، اندازه گیری شد. پس از اطمینان یافتن از برازش قابل قبول الگوهای اندازه گیری و ساختاری پژوهش، مدل نهایی کیفیت افشای اطلاعات حسابداری با استفاده الگوی معادلات ساختاری و روش تجزیه و تحلیل Stepwise  تدوین گردید و اعتبار مدل رگرسیون پیشنهادی پژوهش با استفاد از آزمون t زوجی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت، نتایج حاکی از آن است که رفتار مالی مدیران مبتنی بر روانشناسی شناختی بر کیفیت افشای اطلاعات حسابداری موثر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Presentation of the Quality Model for the Disclosure of Accounting Information Based on the Analysis of Financial Behavior of Cognitive Psychological Viewers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Roya izi 1
  • Mansour Gharkaz 2
  • Parviz Saeidy 3
  • Alireza Matoofi 4
1 Accounting Department, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University of Gorgan, Iran
2 Accounting Department, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University of Gorgan, Iran (Corresponding Author)
3 Accounting Department, Ali Abad-Katoul Unit, Islamic Azad University, Ali Abad-katoul, Iran
4 Accounting Department, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University of Gorgan, Iran,
چکیده [English]

In this research, the relationship between financial behavior of managers based on cognitive psychology and disclosure quality of accounting information was investigated using structural equation approach and regression equations. For this purpose, an example of 128 companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange between 2007 and2017was selected. The financial behavior of managers based on cognitive psychology (in the model of hidden variable structural equations in the independent variable regression model) by observable variables of narrow-mindedness, opportunistic behavior and excessive confidence of managers, and the quality of disclosure of accounting information, also using accruals Each company was measured by the Tehran Stock Exchange and through the Company's reticulation notices regarding the quality of disclosure and appropriate information. After verifying the acceptable fit of the measurement and structural patterns of the research, the final model of the disclosure of accounting information was developed using the structural equation model and the stepwise analysis method. The validity of the proposed regression model was evaluated using paired t-test. The results indicate that financial behavior of cognitive psychological managers is effective on the quality of disclosure of accounting information.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Financial behavior of managers
  • cognitive psychology
  • disclosure quality of accounting information
  • structural equation modeling
  • Regression Model
 
*       Baker, M., Ruback, R. and Wurgler, J. (2007). “Behavioral Corporate Finance”. Handbook of  Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, 1: 145, 86.
*       Birnberg, J, G; (2011). A Proposed Framework for Behavioral Accounting Research, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN CCOUNTING, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1–43.
*       Cheung Y, Jing L., Lu T., Rau P. R., Stouratis A. (2008). Tunnelling and ProppingUp: An Analysis of Related Party Transactions by Chinese Listed Companies. Social Science Research Network, www.ssrn.com, Working Paper Series.
*       Chang, T., S. Hartzmark, D. Solomon, and E. Soltes (2014). Being surprised by the unsurprising: Earnings seasonality and stock returns. Available at SSR N 2460166.
*       Chowdhury, J. (2012). Managerial Myopia : A New Look. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm ?abstract_id =1991429 .
*       Cooper, A.C., Woo, C. and Dunkelberg, W. (1988). “Entrepreneurs Perceived Chances for Success”. Journal of Business Venturing, 3: 97-108.
*       Dess, G. G., & Picken, J. C. (1999). Beyond productivity: How leading companies achieve superior performance by leveraging their human capital. New York: American Management Ass.
*       Ducharme, L., Malatesta P.H. & Sefcik, S.E. (2004). Earnings Management, Stock Issues, and Shareholder Lawsuits. Journal of Financial Economics, 71 (1): 27-49.
*       Duruigbo E. (2014). Tackling shareholder short-termism and managerial myopia.Available at: http://works.bepress.com/emeka_duruigbo/3.
*       Espinosa, M & Trombetta, M. (2007). Disclosure Interactions and the Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from the Spanish Continuous Market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34 (10), 1371-1392.
*       Frydman, C., N. Barberis, Peter Bossaerts(2014), Using Neural Data to Test a Theory of Investor Behavior: An Application to Realization Utility, Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 907–946.
*       Genesove, D. and C. Mayer (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 1233-1260.
*       Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R. & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40 (1–3): 3-73.
*       Hartzmark, S. (2014). The worst, the best, ignoring all the rest: The rank effect andtrading behavior. Review of Financial Studies.
*       Hayward, M.L. & Hambrick, D.C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid in large acquisitions: evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 103-127.
*       Heaton, J.B. (2002). “Managerial Optimism and Corporate Finance”. Financial Management, 31: 33-45.
*       Ho, C.R. and Chang, Y. (2012). “CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Financial Distress, 25th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference”. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2128161.
*       Hribar, P. and Yang, H. (2011). “CEO Overconfidence, Managerial Earnings Forecasts, and Earnings Management”. Working Paper, University of Iowa and Cornell University.
*       Huang, W., Jiang F., Liu, Z. and Zhang, M. (2011). “Agency cost, top executives' Overconfidence, and Investment-cash Flow Sensitivity- Evidence from Listed Companies in China”. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19: 261-277.
*       Jacob G. Birnberg (2011) A Proposed Framework for Behavioral Accounting Research. Behavioral Research in Accounting: Spring, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1-43.
*       Jagolinzer, A. D. (2009). Sec rule 10b5-l and insiders’ strategic trade. Management  cience 55, 224-239.
*       Kahneman, D. and Lovallo, D. (1993). “Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts :A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking”. Management Science, 39 (1): 17- 31.
*       Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, Issue2, Pp: 263-291.
*       Kelly Peter ,W. (2016), U sing Psychology to Understand and D ecode Financial Behavior, A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy,pp1-118.
*       Kern, D.A. (2006). A matter of strategic mis-fit: Management myopia and value destruction. Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
*       Levinthal, D.A. & March, J.G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (S2): 95-112.
*       Lin, Y., Hu, S. and Chen, M. (2005). “Managerial Optimism and Corporate Investment: some Empirical Evidence from Taiwan”. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13: 523-546.
*       Malmendier, U. and Tate, G. (2005). “CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment”. The Journal of Finance, 6: 2661-2700.
*       Miller, K.D. (2002). Knowledge Inventories and Managerial Myopia. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 689-706.
*       Mizik, N. (2010). The Theory and Practice of Myopic Management. Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (4): 594-611.
*       Mizik, N. (2010). The Theory and Practice of Myopic Management. Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (4): 594-611.
*       Moscariello N. (2010). Related Party Transaction: Opportunistic or Efficient Behavior? Evidence from the Italian Listed Company. Working Paper, Second University of Naples.
*       Richardson, S. (2006). “Over-investment of Free Cash Flow”. Review of Accounting Studies, 11: 159-189.
*       Szczygie, D., Buczny, J., & Bazinska, R. (2012).Emotion regulation and emotional information processing: The moderating effect of emotional awareness. Personality and Individual Differences,52, 433–437.
*       Srivastava, R.K., Shervani, T.A. & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62 (1): 2-18.
*       Srivastava, R.K., Shervani, T.A. & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62 (1): 2-18.
*       Thagard, Paul. (2009),Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Cognitive Science Entry; Online Edition.
*       Tomak, S. (2013). “The Impact of Overconfidence on Capital Structure in Turkey”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3: 512- 518.
*       Wunderlich K, Symmonds M, Bossaerts P, Dolan R.) 2011(,Hedging your bets by learning reward correlations in the human brain. Neuron. ;71:1141–1152.
*      Wnuk, S.; Hawa, R. & Sockalingam, S. (2015).“Attachment style and emotional eating in bariatric surgery candidates: The med iating role of difficulties in emotion regulation”. Eating Behaviors. 18, 36- 40