* افشار، ابراهیم؛ حری، عباس؛ جلالی دیزجی، علی؛ منصوریان، یزدان. (1389). روشهای پژوهش ترکیبی در کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی، ماهنامه تخصصی نقد و بررسی کتاب کلیات، سال 13، شماره 9، صص 11-4.
* ایمان، محمدتقی؛ آقاپور، اسلام. (1386). تکنیک زاویه بندی در تحقیقات علوم انسانی. روششناسی علوم انسانی، سال 13، شماره 52.
* ایمان، محمدتقی. (1390). مبانی پارادایمی روشهای تحقیق کمی و کیفی در علوم انسانی، تهران، پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
* حیدری، عباس؛ شقایقی فلاح، مریم. (1394). بررسی اطمینانپذیری مقالات حاصل از مطالعات کیفی منتشرشده در پایگاههای ایرانی، پژوهش پرستاری، دوره 11، شماره 3، صص 17-11.
* خواجوی، شکراله؛ ناظمی، امین. (1386). در جستوجوی تئوری حسابداری مدیریت، مجله حسابرس، شماره 37، صص 71-64.
* خواجوی، شکراله؛ حلاج، محمد؛ گنجی، کیانوش. (1395). مقایسه نظریه دامنه و نظریه روش در پژوهشهای حسابداری مدیریت، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حسابداری مدیریت، سال 9، شماره 29، صص 72-53.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ نیکومرام، هاشم؛ بیات، علی. (1388). بررسی دلایل کمبود پژوهشهای تجربی انجامشده در حوزه حسابداری مدیریت در ایران، فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال 2، شماره 2، صص 104-83.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون. (1391). حسابداری مدیریت رفتاری، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ گودرزی، احمد. (1392). حسابداری مدیریت انتقادی، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال 2، شماره 5، صص 14-1.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ بنی مهد، بهمن؛ میر سعیدی؛ سید جعفر. (1393). مدرنیته و حسابداری مدیریت، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال 3، شماره 12، صص12-1.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ نیکومرام، هاشم؛ طالب نیا، قدرت اله؛ بنی طالبی دهکردی، بهاره. (1394). حسابداری از منظر دانش (ANT) تبیین نظریه شبکه کنشگران، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال 4، شماره 16، صص 130-119.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ نژاد تولمی، بابک. (1395). هستیشناسی حسابداری مدیریت در بستر پست مدرنیته، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حسابداری مدیریت، سال 9، شماره 29، صص 13-1.
* طباطبایی، امیر؛ مرتضوی، حامد؛ طباطبایی چهر، محبوبه. (1392). راهبردهایی برای ارتقاء دقت علمی در پژوهشهای کیفی، مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی خراسان شمالی، شماره 5، صص 670-663.
* گال، مردیت؛ بورگ، والتر، گال، جویس. (1386). روشهای تحقیق کمی و کیفی در علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی (جلد دوم)، ترجمه گروه مترجمان (به اهتمام دکتر احمدرضا نصر)، مرکز چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها (سمت).
* لطفعلیان، مهدی، ولیپور، هاشم. (1394). بررسی اثربخشی سیستم کنترلهای داخلی طراحی شده در شرکت نیروترانس، دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، دوره 4، شماره 16، 14-1.
* محمدپور، احمد؛ صادقی، رسول؛ رضایی مهدی. (1389). روشهای تحقیق ترکیبی به عنوان سومین جنبش روششناختی: مبانی نظری و اصول علمی، مجله پژوهش علوم انسانی دانشگاه اصفهان، شماره 2، صص 100-77.
* مدنی بروجنی، سید احمد؛ نصر، احمدرضا. (1388). سه سوسازی: راهبردی برای نوآوری در پژوهشهای آموزشی، فصلنامه نوآوریهای آموزشی، شماره 30، سال 8، صص 73-53.
* مقدسپور، هنگامه، ابراهیمیکردلر، علی. (1393). تدوین و تبیین مدل توسعه حسابداری مدیریت در ایران. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 3(2)، 73-106.
* منادی، مرتضی. (1385). روش کیفی در علوم اجتماعی و رفتاری، روششناسی علوم انسانی، سال 12، شماره 47.
* نیکومرام، هاشم؛ جلیلی، آرزو. (1391). مدلی مفهومی برای حسابداری مدیریت رفتاری، فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال اول، شماره اول، صص 72-55.
* یغمایی، فریده. (1384). استفاده از تحلیل عاملی در اندازهگیری اعتبار ساختاری، مجله طب و تزکیه، شماره 4، صص 60-50.
* Abernethy, M.A., Brownell, P., (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change. Acc., Organ. Society 24, 189–204.
* Abernethy, M.A., Chua, W.F., Luckett, P.F., Selto, F.S., (1999). Research in managerial accounting: learning from others’ experiences. Acc. Finance 39, 1–27.
* Abernethy, M.A., Lillis, A.M., (1995). The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control systems design. Acc.,Organ. Society 20, 241–258.
* Ahrens, T. and Dent, J.F. (1998), “Accounting and organizations: realizing the richness of field research”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 1-39.
* Alam, M., (1997). Budgetary process in uncertain contexts: a study of state-owned enterprises in Bangladesh. Manage. Acc. Res.8, 147–167.
* Anderson, S.W., (1995). A framework for assessing cost management systems changes: the case of activity based costing implementation at General Motors, 1986–1993. J. Manage. Acc. Res. 7, 1–51.
* Anderson, S.W., Young, S.M., (1999). The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems. Acc., Organ. Society 24, 525–559.
* Anderson, S.W., Young, S.M., (2001). Implementing Management Innovations. Lessons Learned from Activity Based Costing in the U.S. Automobile Industry. Kluwer, Boston.
* Anderson, S.W., Hesford, J.W., Young, S.M., (2002). Factors influencing the performance of activity based costing teams: a field study of ABC model development time in the automobile industry. Acc., Organ. Society 27, 195–211.
* Atkinson, A.A., Shaffir, W., (1998). Standards for field research in management accounting. J. Manage. Acc. Res. 10, 42–68.
* Birnberg, J.G., Shields, M.D., Young, S.M., (1990). The case for multiple methods in empirical accounting research (with an illustration from budget setting). J. Manage. Acc. Res. 2, 33–66.
* Boswell C,Cannon S,(2007). Introduction to nursing research, incorporating evidence based practice. Sudbury,Jons and Barlet.
* Brannen, J., (1992). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: an overview. In: Brannen, J. (Ed.), Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Avebury, Aldershot.
* Brewer, P.C., (1995). National culture and activity-based costing systems: a note. Manage. Acc. Res. 9, 241-260.
* Brewer, J., Hunter, A., (1989). Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
* Bryman, A., (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In: Brennen, J. (Ed.), Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Avebury, Alders hot.
* Burrows, Timothy J. (2013). A Preliminary Rubric Design to Evaluate Mixed Methods Research, Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Faculty of Educational Research and Evaluation.
* Burns, J.(2014), Qualitative management accounting research in QRAM: some reflections, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 11 Iss 1 pp.
* Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W., (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multigrain-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bull. 56, 81–105.
* Chapman, C.S., (2008), We are not alone: qualitative management accounting research, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 5 Iss 3 pp. 247 – 252.
* Chow, C.W., Kato, Y., Merchant, K.A., (1996). The use of organizational controls and their effects on data manipulation and management myopia: a Japan vs U.S. comparison. Acc., Organ. Society 21, 175–192.
* Condie, J. (2012), Beyond rationalizations: improving interview data quality, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 168-193.
* Covaleski, M.A., Dirsmith, M.W., (1983). Budgets as a means of control and loose coupling. Acc., Organ. Society 8, 323–340.
* Creswell, J.W., (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
* Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Second Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
* Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
* Davila, T., (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Acc., Organ. Society 25, 383–409.
* De Loo, I. Lowe, A. (2011), “Mixed methods research: don’t: ‘just do it’”, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 22-38.
* Denzin, N.K., (1978). The Research Act. A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, second ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
* Durden, C. (2014), An Organic Approach In The Context Of A Strategic Focus To Management Control System Development, 2nd Global Conference on Business Management, Program & Abstract Book, 38-49.
* Eisenhardt, K.M., (1989). Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14, 532–550.
* Erzberger, C., Prein, G., (1997). Triangulation: validity and empirically based hypothesis construction. Quality Quantity 31,141–154.
* Ferreira, L.D., Merchant, K.A., (1992). Field research in management accounting and control: a review and evaluation. Acc., Aud.Accountability J. 5 (4), 3–34.
* Guion,Lisa, (2002).Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies. Institute of Food and Agriculture Science.
* Hopwood, A.G., (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. J. Acc. Res. 10 (Supplement),156–182.
* Hopwood, A.G., (1973). An Accounting System and Managerial Behavior. Saxon House, London.
* Hoque, Z., Hopper, T., (1994). Rationality, accounting and politics: a case study of management control in a Bangladeshi jutemill.Manage. Acc. Res. 5, 5–30.
* Hoque, Z., Hopper, T., (1997). Political and industrial relations turbulence, competition and budgeting in the nationalized jute mills of Bangladesh. Acc. Bus. Res. 27, 125–143.
* Humphrey, C., Scapens, R.W., (1996). Theories and case studies of organizational accounting practices: limitation or liberation ?Acc. Aud. Accountability J. 9 (4), 86–106.
* Ismail,K. Ruhana,I. (2011).The Role of Management Accounting Systems In Advanced Manufacturing Environment. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 5(9): 2196-2209
* Ittner, C., Larcker, D., (1997). Quality strategy, strategic control systems, and organizational performance. Acc., Organ. Society22, 293–314.
* Ittner, C., Larcker, D., (2001). Assessing empirical research in management accounting: a value-based management perspective. Acc. Econ. 32, 349–410.
* Jick, T.D., (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24, 602–610.
* Kalagnanam, S.S., Lindsay, R.M., (1999). The use of organic forms of control in JIT firms: generalizing Woodward’s findings to modern manufacturing practices. Acc., Organ. Society 24, 1–30.
* Keating, P.J., (1995). A framework for classifying and evaluating the theoretical contributions of case research in management accounting. J. Manage. Acc. Res. 7, 66–86.
* Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. and Van de Ven, A.H. (2013), “Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity and flow”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 1-13.
* Lee, A.S., (1991). Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organ. Sci. 2, 342–364.
* Lindsay, R.M., (1995). Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: an alternative criterion of adequacy. Acc., Organ. Society20, 35–53.
* Lindsay, R.M., Ehrenberg, A.S.C., (1993). The design of replicated studies. Amer. Statistician 47, 217–228.
* Lillis, A. (2008). Qualitative management accounting research: rationale, pitfalls and potential: A comment on Vaivio (2008). Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 5(3), 239-246.
* Luft, J., Shields, M.D., (2002). Zimmerman’s contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empiricalmanagement accounting research. Europ. Acc. Rev. 11, 795–803.
* Lukka, K., Kasanen, E., (1995). The problem of generalizability: anecdotes and evidence in accounting research. Acc. Aud.Accountability J. 8 (5), 71–90.
* Merchant, K.A., (1985). Organizational controls and discretionary program decision making: a field study. Acc., Organ. Society10,67–85.
* Merchant, K.A., (1990). The effects of financial controls on data manipulation and myopia. Acc., Organ. Society 15, 297–313.
* Modell, S., Lee, A., (2001). Decentralization and reliance on the controllability principle in the public sector. Finan. Accountability Manage. 17, 191–218.
* Modell. S. (2005). Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications. Management Accounting Research 16. 231–254.
* Moores, K., Yuen, S., (2001). Management accounting systems and organizational configurations: a life cycle approach. Acc., Organ. Society 26, 351–389.
* Otley, D.T., (1978). Budget use and managerial performance. J. Acc. Res. 16, 122–149.
* Otley, D.T., (1990). Issues in accountability and control: some observations from a study of colliery accountability in the Britishcoal corporation. Manage. Acc. Res. 1, 101–123.
* Otley, D.T., Berry, A.J., (1994). Case study research in management accounting and control. Manage. Acc. Res. 5, 45–65.
* Otley, D.T., Fakiolas, A., (2000). Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning? Acc., Organ. Society25, 497–510.
* Otley, D.T., Pollanen, R., (2000). Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: a critical appraisal using new evidence. Acc.,Organ. Society 25, 483–496.
* Ryan, B., Scapens, R.W., Theobald, M., (2002). Research Method and Methodology in Finance and Accounting, second ed.Thomson, Padstow.
* Scapens, R.W., (1990). Researching management accounting practice: the role of case study methods. Brit. Acc. Rev. 22, 259–281.
* Scapens, R.W., (1992). The role of case study methods in management accounting research: a personal reflection and a reply. Brit.Acc. Rev. 24, 369–383.
* Shields, M.D., (1997). Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s. J. Manage. Acc. Res. 9, 3–61.
* Sieber, S.D., (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. Amer. J. Sociology 78, 1335–1359.
* Simons, R., (1987). Planning, control, and uncertainty: a process view. In: Bruns, W.J., Kaplan, R.S. (Eds.), Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
* Simons, R., (1987). Accounting control systems and business strategy: an empirical analysis. Acc., Organ. Society 12, 357–374.
* Simons, R., (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives. Acc., Organ. Society 15, 127–143.
* Simons, R., (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Manage. J. 12, 49–62.
* Simons, R., (1994). How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strategic Manage. J. 15, 169–189.
* Smith, M. (2011). Research Methods in Accounting (2nd ed). SAGE Publications Ltd.
* Speziale H, Carpenter D, (2011). Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. Fifth edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins co.
* Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, ThousandOaks.
* Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2010). Current developments and emerging trends in integrated research methodology. InTashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.) Handbook of mixed methodsin social and behavioral research (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
* Tucker, B. Schaltegger, S.(2013). Comparing the research-practice gap in management accounting in Australia and Germany. University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
* Trotman,K. Wright,W. (2012). Triangulation of audit evidence in fraud risk assessments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37 41–53.
* Vaivio, J. (2008), Qualitative management accounting research: rationale, pitfalls and potential, Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 64-86.
* Webb, E. J., D. T. Campbell, R. D. Schwartz, and L. Sechrest. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago : Rand McNally
* Young, S.M., (1996). Survey research in management accounting: a critical assessment. In: Richardson, A.J. (Ed.), Research Methods in Accounting: Issues and Debates, CGA Canada Research Monograph Number 25.
* Young,C,Lee.H. (2014). Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences, The Qualitative Report, Volume 19, Article 64, 1-20.