* حجازی، رضوان، زهره عارف منش، (1394)، اهداف مدیران از کاربرد ارزیابی متوازن. فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال چهارم، شماره پانزدهم، 92-79.
* حجازی، رضوان، منیژه رامشه، (1392)، بررسی روابط میان استراتژی تمایز، نوآوری و سیستم های کنترل مدیریت. فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال دوم، شماره هفتم، 76-61.
* رهنمای رودپشتی فریدون، نیکومرام هاشم، شاهوردیانی شادی (1385). مدیریت مالی راهبردی (ارزش آفرینی). چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات کسا کاوش.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون، بهمن بنی مهد و جعفر میر سعیدی، (1393)، مدرنیته و حسابداری مدیریت، فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال سوم، شماره دوازدهم، 12-1.
* شاهوردیانی، شاهو، ندا ماینائی و محمود علیجانی، (1393)، سنجش عملکرد مبتنی بر متغیرهای چندگانه حسابداری، فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال سوم، شماره نهم، 77-69.
* مومنی منصور، دشتی مجتبی ، بایرام زاده سونا، ندا سلطان محمدی (1392). مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری با تاکید بر سازه های بازتابنده و سازنده. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات مولف.
* نیکومرام، هاشم، آرزو جلیلی، (1391). مدلی مفهومی برای حسابداری مدیریت رفتاری. فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال اول، شماره اول، 72-55.
* Abernethy, M.A., Brownell, P. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 189–204.
* Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
* Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78.
* Bandura, A., 1997. Self efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York.
* Bisbe, J., Batista, Forhuet, J.M., Chenhall, R.( 2007). Defining management accounting constructs: a methodological note on the risk of conceptual misspecification. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32,789–820.
* Bisbe, J., Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 709–737.
* Bray, S.R. (2004). Collective efficacy, group goals, and group performance of a muscular endurance task. Small Group Research, 35, 230–238.
* Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., & Hughes, A. (1980).The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5, 5–27.
* Chen, G., Bliese, P.D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self and collective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 549–556.
* Chenhall, R.H. (2008). Accounting for the horizontal organization: a review essay. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 517–550.
* Chong, K. M., Mahama, H. (2014). The impact of interactive and diagnostic uses of budgets on team effectiveness. Management Accounting Research, 25, 206–222.
* Davila, T. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 383–409.
* Gibson, C.B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. The Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138–152.
* Gigone, D., Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959–974.
* Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K, & Hoy, A.W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–13.
* Gully, S.M, Incalcaterra, K.A, Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J.M. (2002). A Meta analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: inter dependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832.
* Henri, J.F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: a resource based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 529–558.
* Hoigaard, R., Safvenbom, R., & Tonnessen, F.E. (2006). The relationship between group cohesion, group norms, and perceived social loafing in soccer teams. Small Group Research, 37, 217–232.
* Jehn, K.A., Mannix, E.A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intra group conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251.
* Jung, D.I., Sosik, J.J. (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups: the role of empowerment, cohesiveness and collective efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 313–336.
* Kathuria, R., Davis, E.B. (2001). Quality and work force management practices: the managerial performance implication. Production and Operations Management, 10, 460–477.
* Kazub, S.A., McDonnell, J.F. (2000). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. Journal of Sports Behavior, 23, 120–129.
* Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74.
* Lent, R.W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: relation to self efficacy, cohesion, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 73–84.
* Lepper, M.R., Ross, L., & Lau, R.R. (1986). Persistence of inaccurate beliefs about the self: perseverance effects in the classroom. Journal of personality and social psychology, 50, 482–491.
* Lindsley, D.H., Brass, D.J., & Thomas, J.B. (1995). Efficacy performance spirals: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20,645–678
* Little, B.L., Madigan, R.M. (1997). The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 517–534.
* Little, B.L., Madigan, R.M. (1997). The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 517–534.
* Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). Organizations: a quantum view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
* Montagna, p. (1997). Modernism versus Postmodernism in Management Accounting. Critical perspective on Accounting, 8,125-145.
* Mulvey, P.W., Klein, H.J. (1998). The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 62–87.
* Pescosolido, A.T. (2003). Group efficacy and group effectiveness: the effects of group efficacy over time on group performance and development. Small Group Research, 34, 20–42.
* Pethe, S. (2002). Collective measure: development of a measure. Decision Journal, 29, 25–38.
* Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J.D., & Earls, F. (2000). Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.
* Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15, 127–143.
* Simons, R. (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 49–62.
* Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
* Simons, R. (2000). Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
* Wang, S., Lin, S.S.J. (2007). The effects of group composition of self efficacy and collective efficacy on computer supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2256–2268.
* Watson, C.B., Chemers, M.M., & Preiser, N. (2001). Collective efficacy: a multilevel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1057–1068.
* Widener, S.K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 757–788
)